Gymnasiast

The idea of not including WW or TT objects is that not everyone has bought these expansion packs (not surprising, as their quality is way below RCT1/AA/LL/RCT2). Though it wouldn't hurt if some scenarios did use WW or TT objects, in my opinion. As for Erik's scenario: it looks nice. And having a park feature around which the player has to build a park is a concept that RCT1+2 readily used. It would need some interesting terrain and a town of some sort, IMO. And having some sort of theme to the park (water-based?) would be nice. Having good scenarios in the store and/or in-game is very important in my view. At some point I would want to create an official OpenRCT2 scenario set, with the best user-created scenarios, and an official extended scenery set, with things like roof corner pieces.

And how exactly? Rune can't get rid of limitations imposed by SV6, you know. Neither can I or any developer until OpenRCT2 switches to its own save format.

Welcome! Ah, the Zygorators from Canary Mines. I have fond memories of them.

Ugh, why can't I edit my posts after a few minutes? That forces me to double post. Please change that as well. Anyway, what I wanted to suggest is making the forum resemble (Open)RCT2 more in terms of appearance. In a similar way to what OpenRCT.net and tt-forums.net do.

Some points still: Why is this topic listed under Small talk and not under Feedback? I'd say that is the proper category. Is the forums software capable of handling multiple languages? If so, would it be possible to give users the option of using the forums software in Dutch? There is quite a big chunk of the user group from The Netherlands and posting everything in English is already hard enough for some people.

Removing the rank and keeping the dots would have my preference then, though I'm still not convinced it says that much. I have seen so many obnoxious long-time users on forums over the years.

I don't really like the obsession with the number of posts anyway. As if people who talk a lot automatically make more sense. I'd say get rid of them, as well as the posts count next to every post.

This error seems to be gone now.

Clicking a timestamp in the recent posts column will give one an error message.

OpenRCT2.com and OpenRCT.net currently have three different menus between them: - These forum's - Those from the other parts of OpenRCT2.com - Those on OpenRCT.net Considering the integration process is still underway, this might be solved with it.

Yeah! A united community today, and world domination tomorrow!

Well, exactly. The two community forums were recently merged in order to defragment the community, so there no point in fragmenting it using Facebook. The threshold to join here isn't very high, and there is also still the subreddit.

Have you renamed the file to CSS50.DAT and put it in the Data directory?

I have attempted to implement this quite a lot of times, but it seems there is still some original code interfering with it. I had some success, but only with a handful of rides, so my guess is I can override track limits but not vehicle limits. It will probably take some more implementation until I can properly implement it. (8 cars per trainer did it by editing memory, which isn't very easy to do properly.)

I disagree with "You'll have to keep using Wine". Sure, it contains slightly more bugs, but almost all of them are language-related, so running it in UK English will save you most of them. It's certainyl daily usable, which coincidentally is exactly what I do.

OpenRCT2 is available for Linux. You'd have to build it yourself though, or I can provide you with a copy.

Still, it should not crash.

Both the Russian language and the Russian rouble are now available in OpenRCT2.

*64.A trick is to load the Object Selection and get rid of a few unnecessary vehicles.

Rather than extending the current site/forum I still want Jarno and you (Rune) to come up with one community site. (Yeah, I know Jarno will need some convincing, but I think it is very important.)

Indeed. By the way, in the Dutch translation of OpenRCT2, the original name Fungus Woods is used.

- It is certainly possible to introduce one, and I can imagine a few use cases for it- The average user would normally use the object selection window (open object_selection in the console or using the debug tools) to change the selection, though that one still has some issues with some parks.

When we're independent of RCT2.EXE and SV6. Don't expect that too soon please, there is a lot to do until we will be at that point.

Personally I prefer JensJ's idea of Shift+ or Ctrl+ (or Alt+) clicking, since prices have a conversion factor (£1.50 is encoded as 15 and ¥1500 as well, if I'm not mistaken).

Since January 2007 Vista has been preinstalled on most Windows computers. Even if you take the bad reputation of Vista and thus the custom-built XP computers in the Vista era into account, it still means that the cutoff line is 2009. In other words: computers running XP are at least six years old. It means many are going to fail within the following year, forcing the owners to buy a new one anyway. Also, most Linux distributions run well on computers of that age (my mother's laptop is an eight-year-old 1.87 GHz Celeron, running Ubuntu 14.04 without problems).Also, it still leaves all the drawbacks of XP I mentioned. If OpenRCT2 was a paid program, we might have supported XP. But since it isn't, and we have more than enough work on our hands as it is, the extra work involved is not worth it. Even today, we have had only a handful of questions about it, and XP usage is shrinking.