cascadia Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 I'll do a blank map this weekend with the improved trams mentioned above so we can start on the next Group Park. 1 Link to comment
Wuis Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Maybe before we start on themes, we should choose the scenery we want to allow, what expansions etc. and custom scenery? If it's just the base game we could easily make multiple choice polls for each designed area. 2 Link to comment
imlegos Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 I am 100% ok with trying a NCSO mine train again. 2 Link to comment
SpiffyJack Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 57 minutes ago, Wuis said: Maybe before we start on themes, we should choose the scenery we want to allow, what expansions etc. and custom scenery? If it's just the base game we could easily make multiple choice polls for each designed area. 38 minutes ago, imlegos said: I am 100% ok with trying a NCSO mine train again. I'm all for dedicating themed areas. I probably would have had a tighter train of thought in Park 5 is it was done that way also. I know I did a lot of wafting as far as deciding which way to design. @imlegos What is NCSO? some kind of server or something... Link to comment
SpiffyJack Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 9 minutes ago, imlegos said: No Custom Scenery Objects Thanks, I like that idea too. Link to comment
cascadia Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 Here is my starter proposal for Group Park 6. Everything in the park is from the original RCT2, to provide for maximum flexibility to where we go with what expansion packs and custom scenery we use. Thanks to @Broxzier for his suggestions for building the new tram system. The OpenRCT2 Forum Group Park 6.sv6 Feel free to claim and work on the terraforming of the park. 1 Link to comment
SpiffyJack Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 @cascadia you have any thoughts how to shape 4 quadrants? each different? make one a water world? one desert? trees? etc... I'm thinking not so rugged this time (seems like it did more harm than good in #5 ) but more smooth rolling terrain. idk.. I suggest some sketches for the vibe prior to forming 1 Link to comment
SpiffyJack Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) Just throwing this out there to get the juices flowing Edited May 20, 2017 by SpiffyJack add image 1 Link to comment
SpiffyJack Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 Initial stab at map. The OpenRCT2 Forum Group Park 6.1.sv6 1 Link to comment
SpiffyJack Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 On 5/18/2017 at 15:28, cascadia said: The OpenRCT2 Group Park 5.59.sv6 Claimed: - SpiffyJackQueue: -Missed: jensj12, Redscope53, Tune, BlazingEmpireHD, Jochem, YoloSweggLord, giraty, Wuis, SpiffyJack, Broxzier, TCE, Cascadia Link to comment
YoloSweggLord Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) If we're gonna start a new group park, shouldn't we do so in a new thread? Edited May 20, 2017 by YoloSweggLord 1 Link to comment
cascadia Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, YoloSweggLord said: If we're gonna start a new group park, shouldn't we do so in a new thread? We discussed plans for starting this park in the last thread, too. 1 Link to comment
SpiffyJack Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) Just added some paths to link areas The OpenRCT2 Group Park5.60.sv6 Claimed: -Queue: -Missed: jensj12, Redscope53, Tune, BlazingEmpireHD, Jochem, YoloSweggLord, giraty, Wuis, SpiffyJack, Broxzier, TCE, Cascadia, SpiffyJack @jensj12 @RedScope53 @Tune @BlazingEmpireHD @Jochem @YoloSweggLord @giraty @Wuis @Broxzier @TCE @cascadia Edited May 20, 2017 by SpiffyJack 1 Link to comment
Broxzier Posted May 20, 2017 Author Share Posted May 20, 2017 I'll make a new thread for group park 6 tomorrow, so we can move the discussion over there. 2 Link to comment
cascadia Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 Added some extra paths: The OpenRCT2 Group Park5.60a.sv6 1 Link to comment
Wuis Posted May 21, 2017 Share Posted May 21, 2017 Claimed: WuisQueue: -Missed: jensj12, Redscope53, Tune, BlazingEmpireHD, Jochem, YoloSweggLord, giraty, Broxzier, TCE, Cascadia, SpiffyJack Link to comment
Wuis Posted May 21, 2017 Share Posted May 21, 2017 Giraffes Can Spin has been closed due to safety issues. The ride will stay closed until regulations have been sharpened. (probably won't be able to take cats on the ride anymore ) Link to comment
Wuis Posted May 21, 2017 Share Posted May 21, 2017 "Spaghetti Monster? ... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH" Well, Emily S. doesn't seem to be quite happy with monsters. Hmmm... how can we invite her on a coaster without her being too short thus flying out? Yeah, ofcourse, we've got Chinese Treehouse on the other side of the park, but before she'll get there she'll probably not find that exciting enough anymore. So various employees were put to work, but that let to a disaster as guests were presented a brand new thrilling coaster: Apparently they only were said to make a coaster similar to the Spaghetti Monster, and not to build a coaster aimed at the whole family. So, the CEO of the park sneaked into the park to sabotate the cars which would lead to the coaster not passing the next morning's inspection. The coaster did not open that morning, nor did it after that. It was broken. Why the coaster was broken was unknown, but it was quickly decided that the coaster had to be broken down. Interesting fact about the destruction of the coaster was that workers were given double the pay if they put in extra shifts and kept their breaks to a minimum. A new coaster had to be designed and who could do that better than The Penguin they thought, The Penguin was very excited to work on a new project. The board decided to communicate their ideas more to The Penguin so they wouldn't end up with a spaghetti bowl again. Though guests weren't really looking forward to the orderly pattern the coaster would make it's way through, the coaster itself was a artistic masterpiece, but sadly it would only stay as that as nobody wanted to ride it: After the removal it led to confusion, even after the explanation of the park itself. Some people started to riot at the entrances and said they wanted to get on the coaster but it was never provided with a decent entrance, the park has yet to respond on the criticism. As the park couldn't get up a family coaster on their own, they advertised for other companies to design one for the park. A agreement was made, the famous restaurant chain "Pancake Pavilion" would have to ability to open a restaurant on park ground but had to build a good family coaster in return which had to open no later than 5 years after the opening of the restaurant, and they surely did. Because the restaurant chain agreed with the public that the previous coaster shouldn't have been deleted they even added penguins around the track as a reminder. Many people praised the chain for doign so. Due to many people visiting the newly opened restaurant in the years before the opening of the coaster, the coaster had 2 trains with a total of 112 seats on track. Which is also the amount of people who can enter the queue line. Hereby Pancake Pavilion presents to you the coaster Pancake Pavilion: PS. Sorry for any grammar issues I might have made, I'm running on 2 hours of sleep which isn't great, I already tried looking over the text and I've fixed some, but it's like I don't know how to English anymore. Claimed: Missed but pretty much the queue: jensj12, Redscope53, Tune, BlazingEmpireHD, Jochem, YoloSweggLord, giraty, Broxzier, TCE, Cascadia, Wuis ^Changed that up as the park is kinda finished, there's like 1 big space left, so anyone wanting to work on that, do your thing, but a queue seems a bit excessive at this moment. The OpenRCT2 Group Park5.61.sv6 @jensj12@RedScope53@Tune@BlazingEmpireHD@Jochem@YoloSweggLord@giraty@TCE@cascadia@Broxzier 3 Link to comment
Broxzier Posted May 21, 2017 Author Share Posted May 21, 2017 Let's move the discussion for group park 6 here: https://openrct2.org/forums/topic/2481-group-park-6/ Link to comment
Krutonium Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 I went to use this screenshot for the Readme on GitHub, when someone pointed out an error. See top of Lift Hill. 3 Link to comment
Wuis Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 @Krutonium Saw the pull request and the wall being mentioned, if you don't want that fixed, ignore this, I probably misunderstood something. If you'd like so, here two screenshots and the file: The OpenRCT2 Group Park5.61a.sv6 For anyone else, the file is also the newest version of the park. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now