Jump to content

Gymnasiast

Developers
  • Posts

    747
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gymnasiast

  1. 27 minutes ago, YoloSweggLord said:

    @Broxzier is it bad that I saw it as a good thing? He doesn't troll any more.

    Accusing us of things we haven't done, seeing everything as a personal attack, refusing to cooperate, being egocentric and playing the victim are all very troll-like behaviour. I wonder if wolfreak has ever asked himself why he has been banned so often and if that wasn't down to his behaviour.

  2. There are so many things wrong with your post, it's hard to say where to begin.

    First, the allegations towards us. Contrary to what you said: we haven't threatened banning you. In fact, we have been very permissive, choosing to ignore many bad aspects of your behaviour rather than banning you for it. Also: we haven't brushed you or anyone off: we simply want to implement things properly, and we have made it very clear from the start that multiplayer is not anywhere near release quality. You keep accusing us of all kinds of things, we have ignored it so far but our patience is running out. Most projects would probably have banned you a long time ago. Despite all our patience, you keep putting up a bad attitude.

    Then, about your code quality: it's not as good as you, or the people that say you're one of the best devs, think. Far from it. Anyone calling you one of the best devs clearly hasn't seen your code or doesn't know much about programming. We have offered you numerous times to look into it together, but you even refuse putting features into separate branches and opening PRs for them. And then you have the guts to complain we don't accept your features in the game. How are we supposed to do so if you flat out refuse to cooperate?

    In short, you have a bad attitude, you refuse to cooperate and you vastly overestimate your own contributions, but somehow it's all our fault. You're playing the victim here. This will get you nowhere, not on the internet and not in real life. Cut it out.

  3. On 27-12-2015 at 22:28, Broxzier said:

    I saw FredD streaming two days ago and tried helping him then. He's tried most things I could think of (launcher, downloading .zip manually, changing version, running as admin, and maybe some more).

    One thing I suggest doing is downloading the source from Githib, building it, and then running it from visual studio to see where it crashes. Visual Studio 2015 is free to use.

    I would run with --verbose on first before opening the can of worms that is compiling.

  4. The idea of not including WW or TT objects is that not everyone has bought these expansion packs (not surprising, as their quality is way below RCT1/AA/LL/RCT2). Though it wouldn't hurt if some scenarios did use WW or TT objects, in my opinion.

    As for Erik's scenario: it looks nice. And having a park feature around which the player has to build a park is a concept that RCT1+2 readily used. It would need some interesting terrain and a town of some sort, IMO. And having some sort of theme to the park (water-based?) would be nice.

    Having good scenarios in the store and/or in-game is very important in my view. At some point I would want to create an official OpenRCT2 scenario set, with the best user-created scenarios, and an official extended scenery set, with things like roof corner pieces.

  5. 4 hours ago, SnowMew said:

    To add, make sure you haven't placed the piece of scenery in the park when you plan on disabling it. You can only take out scenery which dosen't exist in your park.

    Granted once Runen hits his own build we should be able to exceed the already existing limits in the game.

    And how exactly? Rune can't get rid of limitations imposed by SV6, you know. Neither can I or any developer until OpenRCT2 switches to its own save format.

  6. Ugh, why can't I edit my posts after a few minutes? That forces me to double post. Please change that as well.

    Anyway, what I wanted to suggest is making the forum resemble (Open)RCT2 more in terms of appearance. In a similar way to what OpenRCT.net and tt-forums.net do.

  7. Some points still: :)

    • Why is this topic listed under Small talk and not under Feedback? I'd say that is the proper category.
    • Is the forums software capable of handling multiple languages? If so, would it be possible to give users the option of using the forums software in Dutch? There is quite a big chunk of the user group from The Netherlands and posting everything in English is already hard enough for some people.
  8. 2 hours ago, JarnoVgr said:

    Removing the actual post count is fine with me. Hovering on someone's name will still show it.

    However, I'm against removing the ranks. Maybe remove the title of the ranks put keep the dots/pips? It's still a good indicator if someone is an active forums user or someone new.

    Removing the rank and keeping the dots would have my preference then, though I'm still not convinced it says that much. I have seen so many obnoxious long-time users on forums over the years.

×
×
  • Create New...