Jump to content

ziscor

Members
  • Posts

    412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ziscor

  1. Hello everyone. Officially making a comeback now. A lot has happened over the last year (and more) that I’d love to get into someday, but won’t bore everyone to sleep with here. :P While some people may know I did already come back, back in October-ish (BlazingEmpireHD, imlegos, YoloSweggLord, cascadia and a few more should be able to attest to that to varying degrees), I hope to make myself useful here once more. :)

    So how is everyone? I’ve been focusing on CSO-based scenery-making this whole while so my NCSO is very terrible right now. Hope I can focus on that aspect here with the newest Group Park! 

    Again, feels good to be back guys. Should I post some OpenRCT2 work I got around to this past year? :D

    • Like 2
  2. Hello everyone. This is a message for everyone that uses these forums and has seen me around in their time here. I'm at a certain cross roads in my life where I have to choose between certain things for my future, among them my presence around this project. What I've aimed at for my life is too high for my own sake, and to achieve that I'll have to let go of certain things. I've decided to take a leave for a year from this site and anything to do with OpenRCT2 and RCT2. They are taking too much of my daily hours and I've realized staying away from it is the only way I can do myself justice. 

    So with that, I take a leave from this place for a year. Hope to see you all right here when I come back! ;)

    • Like 1
  3. I completely forgot your question. :P

    But I'm pretty sure that since one of them is a lie, that means two other situations on themselves are possible simultaneously  as per the conditions. Based on this, three distinct scenarios can be constructed, out of which 2 will be impossible. If one were to let the 3 play out carefully, they could detect the one which is possible, and precisely which statement of the three is a lie.

  4. Allowing Incorrect Checksums when the console clearly says an entire DAT file (I'm assuming) is missing is not nice to do, @Broxzier meant.

    You should upload ITMZLINE.DAT so the ride does not require one to use "Allowing loading files with incorrect checksums" in the first place.:)

  5. I'm sure once Group Park 3 is done, we'll all move on to this project. More people are key to enjoying this format of rapid claiming. :D

    I'd claim it now, but I'm waiting to see you veterans build more so I can understand the building style. I hardly build with realism in mind so hope to gain more from this project particularly!

  6. Done. Here's the change log:

    • Changed the color of the Monorail for all trains as well as the general track. In my opinion the Monorail track is better off with a color combo that goes suitably well with every other color: black/white. As for the trains, I just didn't like the old colors, lol. Feel free to change. 
    • Named all the rest of the numbered handymen actual names. Don't read them, please.
    • I've made a path that leads inside the whole flat ride fest going above. Hope to add a car ride or something in there if possible in the future. If anyone would like to, please utilize that indoor area yourself while letting me know. For now, the path isn't connected to the main peep paths, nor have I built indoors yet through zero clearances. Keep it as it is unless you plan on building a ride or something.

    htr.PNG

    • Added waiting times for half-loads (min. and max. both) for the above mentioned flat-rides, hopefully rides are more practical now.
    • Cleared some useless forest area I had made in the last turn to make more space; painted it the usual golden-grid texture. The forest cover does occupy a lot of space, I must say.

    Just putting it out there for discussion: could this park do with a second entrance? I was thinking it might add more evenly distributed peep traffic to the entire park, which might allow neglected rides to become popular. This is all just speculation on my part, but what are y'all's thoughts? 

    Boy, this save file is getting quite large now, amirite? I'd love for us to make this park CC/ Expansion free so it can be considered for the next Title Sequence! xD

    The OpenRCT Group Park 3.56.sv6

    Claimed: -
    Queue: @cascadia, wilburg22, jensj12, Wuis, Yimmy, RedScope53, Dan, Philmon11, Broxzier, ziscor
    Missed: imlegos, SuperVarken, WobblyRails

  7. Claimed: ziscor
    Queue: Cascadia, wilburg22, jensj12, Wuis, Yimmy, RedScope53, Dan, Philmon11, Broxzier
    Missed: imlegos, SuperVarken, WobblyRails

  8. Okay, now you guys are simply asking for it :P

    Granted, but your height crosses the Earth's immediate atmosphere, resulting in death by lack of Oxygen and extreme pressures. Your corpse is recognized as the World's Tallest Object, and you are classified as a World Heritage Site in a few years. Better than nothing, eh?

    I wish I get into IIT (Indian Institute of Technology).

  9. You might be having an issue of incorrect checksums in the save file. Just to make sure, is the option "Allow loading files with incorrect checksums" enabled? It's in the Miscellaneous options tab.

    You should probably upload the save file in any case. .sv6 is still the file format for OpenRCT2 save files, and you should be having no issues migrating them over from RCT2. Also, could you be exactly specific as to what the error says? Thank you.

    Welcome to the forums!

  10. I've seen this plenty of times and the short answer might be: everyone has burned out. I remember losing all interest because of playing nothing but RCT, and it forced me to try other games which was good. Now, I don't know if it is the exact case, but if you ask me I haven't seen many familiar faces on Multiplayer these days. If not the entire game, people can even get tired by the Multiplayer aspect in specific (like I did).

    Another possibility is that duty has called upon them. Most folk that play (okay not most) OpenRCT2 are college students who are likely having more assignments and papers to submit these days. 

    For both possibilities the easy answer is to wait things out. Since the community is very small still, a lot of people burn out or have work at the same time, which means they'll also come back at their own pace instead. 

    If you have any interest in making a Server, please do. We still have lots of people playing (if not familiar faces for the most part). Maybe people are simply afraid of the trolls like cascadia suggested.

    • Like 1
  11. I've heard marijnvdwerf  and LRFLEW throw ideas around about making a 3D renderer for the game, and Marijn is already making progress. Plus, still got my fingers crossed on seeing features from Locomotion added to this. I can easily say OpenRCT2 might be the best theme park game for years to come. :D Parkitect and PC ain't got nothing on ORCT2! 

    Granted, but OpenRCT3 has 0 improvements/ changes on the original game that it's pointless to play it anyway. 

    I wish Monorails were not the topic of this forum game for more than 50% of the time.

  12. I haven't forgotten. This is supposed to be more realistic than the other Group Parks, I seem to recall. We need less Roller Coasters in here and more of everything else. I suggest avoiding to build rides in every single turn as well, please.

  13. I can't resist joining :P

    Claimed: -
    Players: Broxzier, jensj12, imlegos,  UTMAN, ziscor
    Cooldown (2): Cascadia(2)

    If I remember correctly the cool-down still doesn't change, right?

×
×
  • Create New...